Is Spurgeon Right?

If you have been counting, we are at our fifth episode. We have reached a milestone. I thought it would be helpful to pause here and ask, Why are we doing this? Why are we looking to the past? Why, in other words, bother with church history?

I suspect I’m preaching to the choir. You’re listening because you already know the answer. You know why we need to spend some time in the past and listen to the voices from church history. But it doesn’t hurt to spend some time thinking about this question. Even choirs need to be reminded from time to time. So, back to our question: Why church history, why is it important?

Charles SpurgeonFor the answer, I want to go back to the eighteen hundreds and I want to go back to London. I want to go to Charles Haddon Spurgeon. Now, I like Spurgeon for a lot of reasons, but I especially like him because he helps me with my friends from the different aisles. Or should I say, my friends from the different pews. Spurgeon is great for my Baptist friends because he was a Baptist. But he is also great for my Presbyterian friends because he smoked cigars, and my Lutheran friends love him because he is a nineteenth-century reincarnation of Martin Luther himself. So there you have it, Spurgeon rules.

Charles Haddon Spurgeon pastored the Metropolitan Tabernacle, a great church in a great part of London known as “Elephant and Castle.” The Londoners would flock to hear Spurgeon preach. In fact, people even travelled the Atlantic to hear him preach. He wrote many sermons of course, while he was at the Metropolitan Tabernacle. And Spurgeon also wrote many books. In one of his many books, Spurgeon made a comment well worth hearing. It comes from the preface to his book on commentaries. A book he wrote for pastors to convince them of the need to use commentaries and to engage in deep study for their sermon preparation. Spurgeon well knew the value of reading for preaching. He had a personal library of around 25,000 books. And this in the eighteen hundreds! And what’s more, he actually read most of them.

Well, in the preface to his book, he speaks to an objection to using commentaries. The objection goes something like this: As a Christian, I have the Holy Spirit. And I have his wonderful work of illumination. I don’t need commentaries, I don’t need to rely on the thoughts of others, I can go right to the source.

Now, here’s Spurgeon’s answer to that objection. And I quote, “I find it odd that he who thinks so highly of what the Holy Spirit teaches him, thinks so little of what the Holy Spirit teaches others also.”

In this quote, Spurgeon reminds us that the Holy Spirit is not an individual gift. The Holy Spirit is a corporate gift to the body of Christ, and he has taught others, and uses others to teach us. So Spurgeon’s argument reaches the conclusion: use commentaries. Don’t be arrogant, and don’t think you have a corner on the market of the Holy Spirit—you don’t.

Now, let’s expand Spurgeon’s argument and apply it to the church today and its relationship to church history. Here’s my paraphrase of Spurgeon’s argument: I find it odd that the church of the 21st century thinks so highly of what the Holy Spirit has taught it today that it thinks so little of what the Holy Spirit has taught the church in the first century, the second, the third, the forth, and so on, and so on.

The Holy Spirit is not unique to our age. The Holy Spirit has been at work in the church for the past 21 centuries. We could put the matter this way—it is rather prideful to think that we have nothing to learn from the past. And remember, pride is a sin. And also remember, as Scripture says, “pride comes before a fall.” We need a little humility. Enough humility to say we may not have all the answers in the present. Enough humility to say, we need the past, and enough humility to visit it from time to time, even if it is only for 5 minutes.

Stay connected with 5 Minutes in Church History by getting the weekly podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or via RSS. You can also subscribe to the blog via RSS and follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Share this article:
Comments

Leave a Comment


     
    Sharon Loria posted:
    9:39 am, September 11, 2013

    I could not agree with you more … We need to study commentaries, the writings of Christians of earlier times, etc. there is much depth of wisdom in them.

    Reply

     
    Brian Lee posted:
    4:58 pm, September 12, 2013

    Dr. Nichols, thank you for your faithfulness to Scripture and for these lessons from Church History! My family and I are certainly enjoying them and we’ve shared this site with everyone we know. May God continue to bless you and this ministry!

    Be happified :-)

    Reply

     
    Stephen Nichols posted:
    8:33 am, September 13, 2013

    If you would like to learn more about Spurgeon, you’ll enjoy Dr. Steven Lawson’s The Gospel Focus of Charles Spurgeon–an inspiring read to spur on your passion for the gospel and gospel proclamation.

    Also, yesterday as this podcast was releasing, I providentially received my copy of Tom Nettle’s Living by Revealed Truth: The Life and Pastoral Theology of Charles Haddon Spurgeon.

    It’s not too early to start your Christmas wish list!

    Reply

     
    What a Mosaic Can Te posted:
    10:49 am, September 18, 2013

    […] time, we were in Great Britain visiting with Charles Haddon Spurgeon. Let’s stay in England for a while, but let’s go back a little further than the […]

    Reply

     
    Sharon Mack posted:
    12:19 pm, September 21, 2013

    Wow! This is so true. I find reading about what the Holy Spirit has revealed to other Believers in Christ to be helpful to me especially when I’m not clear whether my understanding is good enough. I like commentaries because they help clarify or confirm my understanding of Scripture. Great topic, thanks!

    Reply

     
    Charlie Dickinson posted:
    1:02 pm, November 28, 2013

    Great!

    Reply

     
    Tradition? | 5 Minut posted:
    10:38 am, January 8, 2014

    […] few episodes back on 5 Minutes in Church History, I think I quoted to you from Charles Spurgeon. And we were talking […]

    Reply